Rapture (Rebuke)-19
 
[ Regarding THE 2D COMING ]
 
"And If I go, I will come again"..
 
[9] ..oh, i otta let it go, but..i just gotta do this: "Regarding Jn 14 vs 1-4, esp v3: You've got a real good point that v3 really sets it up that "He'll prepare you (us) a place"--(bravo, got that)..
 
 And "since we know He left, He'll come again and receive us to Himself".. fine. ..but then, if we skip what He says next in v3, and go straight to v4, v4 seems to seal it; that ("it seems") we all go up there "straight to the Father's house", obvious: to, where we be-lieve His House is, (yes, that would be) "in heaven". i'll give you that "regarding your theory" so far. BUT..let's go "back to v3 a-gain" and pick up what we skipped: first off, He "left", so yes, "He will Come Again"! ..good, we all agree with that, and it will be so. And that's, the very next time "He Comes"..right?  yes.
 
 ok, But now let's look at that "little phrase": 'that where I Am you may be also':  Y'all have "raptured us" all "straight up to The Father's House, or Throne" in Heaven: "by-passing 1 Cor 15 & 1 Thes 4" where "we go up in the air and meet THE LORD' there 'in clouds'!  You can't make a ("Rapture") Doctrine outa 1/3 of a verse! when many, many, or should i say other verses "explain" where we really go first!! Those other verses explain what the details are "in-between" His sayings. (Not like what y'all do "in between": which is, fabricate your own "fillins" for your fantasy of ridiculousness; instead of using solid "truth-based scripture support" to found your doctrinal "truth"! ..my my. ok, enough of this)
 
 Now look back at the verse 3 phrase again: '..Where I Am, there you may be also': Did you ever consider the thought that, "oh, that means: "Wherever HE MIGHT Go", or "Be", you and i get to be in that place with Him"? ..meaning that: If He were 'in the clouds'=(in our air, in our atmosphere, around our earth) you and i get to be there too.  oh i know this is new..and deep; ..but, did you.
  So, your theory, though a good try, does not carry enough sub-stance to qualify it as the Grand Scale Doctrine you propose: ie. "a whisping away straight up to heaven" just cuz you like the "vision" of it (when all the time you're using Paul's 2 very weighty "2d Coming Scriptures" (again) as you're accustomed to, and out of order) to concoct your own idea! It's a terrible try and a violation of the true meaning of God's proposed words of prophecy; therefore you can't say you're "rightly dividing the word".
..In Other Words, you've sent all this in (John14.1-4) back to Paul's